摘要To analyze and compare the vehicle performance effects of hydraulic bushings with those of the traditional rubber bushings of double wishbone front suspensions, we test the static and dynamic properties of the hydraulic bushings of control arms. The mechanical model is built in ADAMS and is then used as basis for establishing the full vehicle model. The random road surface spectra of different levels are built by using the harmony superposition method. The ride comfort of the full vehicle with a control arm installed with hydraulic and rubber bushings is simulated on random and bump roads. The frequency spectrum characteristic and root mean square (RMS) of the vertical and longitudinal acceleration of the foot floor and seat rail are calculated via power spectrum estimation, and the handling stability of the full vehicle is then simulated. The effects of the change in hydraulic bushing stiffness on ride comfort are finally analyzed. The following results are obtained. (1) The effects of such change on vehicle handling are relatively small regardless of the type of bushing used. (2) The vehicle shows acceptable ride comfort on level A and level B roads but shows poor ride comfort on bump road when a hydraulic bushing is used. (3) Large hydraulic bushing stiffness increases the vertical acceleration RMS on level A, level B, and bump roads. However, the variety of RMS is extremely small on level D roads, the responses of the vertical and longitudinal acceleration curves are slow, and the time oscillation of the curves is relatively long on bump road.
Abstract：To analyze and compare the vehicle performance effects of hydraulic bushings with those of the traditional rubber bushings of double wishbone front suspensions, we test the static and dynamic properties of the hydraulic bushings of control arms. The mechanical model is built in ADAMS and is then used as basis for establishing the full vehicle model. The random road surface spectra of different levels are built by using the harmony superposition method. The ride comfort of the full vehicle with a control arm installed with hydraulic and rubber bushings is simulated on random and bump roads. The frequency spectrum characteristic and root mean square (RMS) of the vertical and longitudinal acceleration of the foot floor and seat rail are calculated via power spectrum estimation, and the handling stability of the full vehicle is then simulated. The effects of the change in hydraulic bushing stiffness on ride comfort are finally analyzed. The following results are obtained. (1) The effects of such change on vehicle handling are relatively small regardless of the type of bushing used. (2) The vehicle shows acceptable ride comfort on level A and level B roads but shows poor ride comfort on bump road when a hydraulic bushing is used. (3) Large hydraulic bushing stiffness increases the vertical acceleration RMS on level A, level B, and bump roads. However, the variety of RMS is extremely small on level D roads, the responses of the vertical and longitudinal acceleration curves are slow, and the time oscillation of the curves is relatively long on bump road.
基金资助:Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51465023); the Natural Science Research Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology(No.KKSY201402065)
高晋, 牛子孺, 杨秀建, 张昆. 悬架控制臂液压衬套与整车平顺性关联分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(4): 102-110.
GAO Jin, NIU Zi-ru, YANG Xiu-jian, ZHANG Kun. Correlative Analysis of Hydraulic Bushing of Suspension Control Arm and Full Vehicle Ride Comfort. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(4): 102-110.
[1] MA Tian-fei, LIU Ya-zhou, QIAO Xue-bing, et al. Fluid-Structure-interaction Modeling and Dynamic Behavior Analysis for Hydrobushing of Suspension[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 24(7):857-860. (in Chinese)
[2] KARLSSON F, PERSSON A. Modeling Non-linear Dynamics of Rubber Bushings:Parameters Identification and Validation[D]. Lund, Sweden:Lund University, 2003.
[3] SCENSSON M, HAKANSSON M. Hydrobushing Model for Mutibody Simulation[D]. Lund, Sweden:Lund University, 2004.
[4] PAN Xiao-yong, XIE Xin-xing, SHANGGUAN Wen-bin. Dynamic Properties Analysis for a Hydraulic Rubber Isolator under Excitations with Difference Amplitudes[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(1):144-149. (in Chinese)
[5] SHANGGUAN Wen-bin, XU Chi. Experiment and Calculation Methods for Analyzing Dynamic Performance of Hydraulic Bushings Used in Control Arms of a Suspension[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2007, 26(9):7-10. (in Chinese)
[6] LÜ Zhen-hua, SHANGGUAN Wen-bin, LIANG Wei, et al. Experimental Methods and Test Evaluation for the Dynamic Characteristics of Hydraulically Damped Rubber Mount[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2004, 15(2):182-186. (in Chinese)
[7] LI Zhong-xing,YU Guang-qiang,JIANG Hong,et al. Simulation and Test of Ride Comfort of Bus with Air Suspension Based on ADAMS[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010, 27(2):125-128.(in Chinese)
[8] LI Wei-ming, ZHU Hong-ping, HUANG Min-yong, et al. Numerical Calculation Methods and Statistic Characters on Road Surface Random Spectral Excitation[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2009, 22(3):20-25.(in Chinese)
[9] ZHANG Yi, MO Xu-hui, ZHONG Zhi-hua, et al. Research and Optimization of Ride Comfort for Rhombic Bus under Random Road[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 22(23):2894-2895.(in Chinese)
[10] LI L, SANDU C. Modeling and Simulation of 2D ARMA Terrain Models for Vehicle Dynamics Application.[DB/OL]. (2007-04-16)[2014-06-06]. Http://papers.sae.org/2007-01-0138.
[11] KANG D, HEO S, KIM H. Virtual Road Profile Modeling Using Equivalent Damage Method for VPG Simulation[DB/OL]. (2009-04-20)[2014-06-06]. Http://papers.sae.org/2009-01-0814.
[12] YAND Yi-ming, WEN Ai-min, LIU Yi-guan. Reconstruction of 3D Road Model and Its Verification Based on Adams[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010, 27(12):141-144. (in Chinese)
[13] ZHOU Chang-feng, LI Yan-xiao, LIU Jia, et al. Ride Comfort Simulation of Vehicle on Impulse Road Based on ADAMS[J]. Tractor & Farm Transporter, 2012, 39(2):22-25.(in Chinese)
[14] XUE Jin-lu, WANG Hong-yan, CHI Bao-shan. Stochastic 3D-road-surface Modeling for Virtual Testing[J]. Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery, 2012, 10(2):238-239.(in Chinese)
[15] GAO Jin, YANG Xiu-jian. Sensitivity Study of Bushing Stiffness Affecting Suspension Compliance Characteristic and Transient Handing Stability[J]. Automotive Technology, 2013(11):36-37.(in Chinese)
[1]
胡亚辉, 董皓, 张君安. 整体式梯形转向机构最优区域值计算及优化[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 103-110.
[2]
张洪军, 王雪飞, 刘可可. 高速公路清扫车风机系统仿真及优化研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 92-97.
[3]
唐自强, 龚贤武, 潘勇, 唐超, 王玮琳. 基于行驶状态估计的车车协同纵向安全距离模型[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(2): 103-110.
[4]
李文亮, 周炜, 张禄, 曹琛. 考虑路面不平度和速度分布的用户目标载荷构建方法[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(2): 52-55.
[5]
张禄, 王云鹏, 任春晓, 刘婷洁. 机械零部件时变可靠性及其灵敏度分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 10(1): 104-110.
[6]
王书举, 潘一山, 张国胜, 崔海涛. 基于ECE R66法规的客车侧翻碰撞安全性分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(4): 97-101.
[7]
贾爱琴, 崔建锋, 陈建军, 高卫. 基于可靠灰色粒子群算法的汽车悬架参数的多目标优化设计[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(3): 102-110.
[8]
胡东海, 何仁. 基于电液复合制动系统的电动汽车再生制动控制策略研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(1): 105-110.
2015, Vol. 9 
