|
|
|
| Study on Spatial Pattern of Regional Tourism under Influence of High-speed Tourism Corridor——A Case Study of Taihang Mountain Expressway |
| BAI Long1,2, LU Zi1,2, GAO Yu-jian3, GAO Wei1,2 |
1. School of Resource and Environment Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang Hebei 050024, China;
2. Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang Hebei 050024, China;
3. Transport Planning and Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100028, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In order to study the influence of Taihang Mountain Expressway on the tourism industry pattern of Taihang Mountain area in Hebei Province, the vector data of Taihang Mountain Expressway, the data of 43 exit nodes along the Expressway and the data of 76 scenic spots above 3A level are collected and sorted out. The unique association of the scenic spot-expressway exit node is constructed, the sum of the fuzzy contact intensities of the scenic spot-expressway exit nodes and the sum of the fuzzy contact intensities of the associated scenic spot nodes of each expressway exit are calculated, the fuzzy agglomeration of each exit node is calculated, and the spatial tourist grouping scheme based on COP objective function is analyzed and adjusted by the using the improved F-AMST model (designed with twice-splitting and twice-clustering). The result shows that (1) under the influence of Taihang Mountain Expressway, the result of spatial tourist grouping in this area includes 4 primary groups and 8 secondary groups; (2) by comparing with the results of previous studies of the division of mountainous tourism agglomeration areas in Hebei Province, the result of spatial tourist grouping is basically consistent with those of mountainous tourism agglomeration areas, but the fuzzy clustering intensity of spatial tourist grouping is significantly better than that of agglomeration division, that is, the completion and opening of Taihang Mountain Expressway enhances the agglomeration among scenic spots; (3) under the influence of Taihang Mountain Expressway filtration effect,there are 18 "vacuum filtration" nodes without scenic area connection and 3 "secondary filtration" nodes with less fuzzy association intensity; (4) Taihang Mountain Expressway provides opportunities and possibilities for the formation of new tourist destination geospatial patterns, the grouping of cross-administrative region boundary, and the combination of "fast-slow" combined transport network system.
|
|
Received: 19 April 2021
|
| Fund:Supported by the 2020 Innovative Funding Project for Doctoral Students of Hebei Education Department (No.CXZZBS2020079); the 2021 Science and Technology Project of Hebei Education Department (No.QN2021089). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
BAI Long
E-mail: bailong051234@163.com
|
|
|
|
[1] WANG Ji, GU Xiao-feng, YAN Chang-ping. Research on Classification Method of Tourist Highways from Multi-dimensional Perspectives[C]//Proceedings of 2018 World Transport Convention. Beijing:China Highway and Transportation Society, 2018:927-936. (in Chinese)
[2] FENG Mei-jun. Research on Main Realization Path of "Expressway Service Area + Tourism"[C]//Proceedings of 2018 World Transport Convention. Beijing:China Highway and Transportation Society, 2018:2193-2198. (in Chinese)
[3] HU Meng. Jiangsu:"Tourism+Culture+Highway"[J]. China Highway, 2018,12(12):58-60. (in Chinese)
[4] HE Jin. Preliminary Study on Conceptual Innovation and Practice of Tourist Highway Design[J]. Highway, 2018,63(11):220-223. (in Chinese)
[5] HUANG Zhan-jun. Inspiration of Tourism Scenic Highways in US and Australia for Designing Tourism Highway of Binhai, Guangdong[J]. Highway, 2018,63(7):265-269. (in Chinese)
[6] DENSTADLI J, JACOBSEN J. The Long and Winding Roads:Perceived Quality of Scenic Tourism Routes[J]. Tourism Management, 2011, 32(4):780-789.
[7] MOKHTAR S, SHIMIZU T. An Analysis of Service Needs for Self-drive Tourist:Proposing for Better Policies for Malaysia's Road Network[J].Proceedings of Social Technology Research, 2016, 13:22-31.
[8] ETTEMA D, GÄRLING T, OLSSON L E, et al. The Road to Happiness:Measuring Dutch Car Drivers' Satisfaction with Travel[J]. Transport Policy, 2013, 27:171-178.
[9] FJELSTUL J, FYALL A. Sustainable Drive Tourism:A Catalyst for Change[J]. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2015, 17(5):460-470.
[10] BRIEDENHANN J, WICKENS E. Tourism Routes as a Tool for the Economic Development of Rural Areas:Vibrant Hope or Impossible Dream?[J]. Tourism Management, 2004, 25(1):71-79.
[11] HUANG W J, BEECO J A, HALLO J C, et al. Bundling Attractions for Rural Tourism Development[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2016, 24(10):1387-1402.
[12] HARDY A. An Investigation Into the Key Factors Necessary for the Development of Iconic Touring Routes[J]. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 2003, 9(4):314-330.
[13] ROLFE J, DYACK B. Testing for Convergent Validity Between Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Estimates of Recreation Values in the Coorong, Australia[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2010, 54(4):583-599.
[14] HUANG Ai-lian, Spatial Justice and China-Vietnam Cross-border Tourism Cooperation[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2017, 32(4):5-6. (in Chinese)
[15] MARTIN-ORTEGA J, OJEA E, ROUX C. Payments for Water Ecosystem Services in Latin America:A Literature Review and Conceptual Model[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 6(12):122-132.
[16] COHEN E, COHEN S A. Current Sociological Theories and Issues in Tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2012, 39(4):2177-2202.
[17] KOESTANTIA T, NURYANTI W, SUWARNO N, et al. The Distribution Pattern of Creative Industries and the Spatial System of Tourist Destinations in Indonesia:The Case of Bandung[J]. International Journal of Architecture and Design, 2014, 25(2):1140-1148.
[18] GAO W, ZHANG Q, LU Z, et al. Modelling and Application of Fuzzy Adaptive Minimum Spanning Tree in Tourism Agglomeration Area Division[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 143(3):317-326.
[19] ASSUNÇÃO R M, NEVES M C, CEMARA G, et al. Efficient Regionalization Techniques for Socio-economic Geographical Units Using Minimum Spanning Trees[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2006, 20(7):797-811.
[20] DIJKSTRA E W. A Note on Two Problems in Connexion with Graphs[J]. Numerische Mathematik, 1959, 1(1):269-271.
[21] LU Z, ZHANG Q, DU X, et al. A Fuzzy Social Network Centrality Analysis Model for Interpersonal Spatial Relations[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 105(8):206-213.
[22] KIM M, RAMAKRISHNA R S. New Indices for Cluster Validity Assessment[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2005, 26(15):2353-2363.
[23] GURRUTXAGA I, ALBISUA I, ARBELAITZ O, et al. SEP/COP:An Efficient Method to Find the Best Partition in Hierarchical Clustering Based on a New Cluster Validity Index[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2010, 43(10):3364-3373.
[24] WU Xue, ZHANG Hong. Influence of High-speed Rail on Tourism Industry Agglomeration and Diffusion:A Case Study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2019, 35(7):986-992. (in Chinese)
[25] ZACH F, RACHERLA P. Assessing the Value of Collaborations in Tourism Networks:A Case Study of Elkhart County[J]. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2011, 28(1):97-110.
[26] NICHOLLS W. Place, Networks, Space:Theorising the Geographies of Social Movements[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2009, 34(1):78-93.
[27] ROLFE J, FLINT N. Assessing the Economic Benefits of a Tourist Access Road:A Case Study in Regional Coastal Australia[J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2018, 58(1):167-178.
[28] JI Xiao-feng, LI Jun-fang, CHEN Fang. Coupling Characteristics of Spatial Transport Linkage between Regional Tourism Passenger Transport and Regular Passenger Transport[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 35(2):137-143. (in Chinese)
[29] MICHAŁŻ. Tourism Destination:The Networking Approach[J]. Moravian Geographical Reports, 2016, 24(4):2-14. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 15 
