|
|
|
| Optimal Warning Distance for Expressway Construction Area under Mixed Traffic Flow |
| YUAN Rui1, CHEN Ning1,3, TONG Yao1, JIA Jian-lin1, CHEN Yan-yan1 |
1. School of Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2. Transport Planning and Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100028, China;
3. Toyota Urban Transport Research Institute, Aichi-ken 471-0024, Japan |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To alleviate the sharp decline in traffic efficiency caused by reduced number of lanes or the presence of obstacles and reduce the risk of accidents due to frequent lane changes or acceleration and deceleration in expressway operation area, taking the Wufengshan north-south 4-lane river crossing channel in Jiangsu Province as the research environment, the related research on typical operation area of expressway is conducted, a comprehensive indicator system for efficiency, safety and fuel consumption in expressway operation area is constructed. Based on Vissim simulation software, considering different traffic volumes, assembly rates and warning distance conditions, the road scenario and warning model are created. The optimal warning distance for vehicles under different conditions in expressway operation area is studied by using Bayesian neural network for prediction. The result shows that the average relative errors of this method for predicting the comprehensive, safety and energy consumption indicators of expressway operation area are 0.4%, 0.4% and 0.2% respectively. Through the analysis of the optimal warning distance for comprehensive efficiency, safety and energy consumption indicators, it is concluded that (1) higher assembly rates lead to better result in all the 3 indicators, and the optimal warning distance becomes shorter; (2) under free flow condition, the optimal warning distance is 300-800 m and it increases with the increase of traffic volume; (3) under saturated traffic flow condition, the optimal warning distance is 800-1 200 m, but the increase in traffic volume at this time has little influence on the warning distance; (4) after traffic volume is oversaturated, the optimal warning distance is 1 200-1 800 m, and it continues to increase as the traffic volume increases. The research result can provide some reference for the safe driving of vehicles in expressway operation area and the issuance of road warning by traffic management departments, and also provide a method for predicting the optimal distance of vehicle warning in expressway operation areas.
|
|
Received: 12 August 2021
|
| Fund:Supported by the Key Science and Technology Projects in the Transportation Industry of the Ministry of Transport (Nos. 2021-ZD2-047, 2022-ZD6-116); the Shandong Provincial Transportation Technology Plan Project (No. 2021B49) |
|
|
|
[1] FHWA. National Standards for Traffic Control Devices; the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways; Revision[R]. Washington, D.C.:FHWA, 2020.
[2] WU Li-xin, HAN Juan. Study on Signal Merge Control at Freeway Work Zone[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2011,28(3):143-147.(in Chinese)
[3] ZHANG Ji-sheng,LI Bin,WANG Xiao-jing, et al. Design of Architecture and Development Roadmap of Smart Expressway[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 35(1):88-94.(in Chinese)
[4] XU Tao-rang,YAO Zhi-hong,JIANG Yang-sheng, et al. Fundamental Diagram Model of Considering Reaction Time in Environment of Intelligent Connected Vehicles[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2020,37(8):108-117.(in Chinese)
[5] ZHU Shun-ying,ZOU He,JIANG Ruo-xi, et al. Traffic Conflict Model for Confluence Section in Highway Construction Area[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020,52(9):70-76.(in Chinese)
[6] MENG Xiang-hai,XU Han-qing,SHI Yong-yi. Identification of Rear-end Collision Risk on Freeway Work Zone and Its Prominent Influencing Factors[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2012,29(12):133-138.(in Chinese)
[7] MENG Q, WENG J, QU X. A Probabilistic Quantitative Risk Assessment Model for the Long-term Work Zone Crashes[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(6):1866-1877.
[8] OH C, PARK S, RITCHIE S G. A Method for Identifying Rear-end Collision Risks Using Inductive Loop Detectors[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2006, 38(2):295-301.
[9] LIU Zhao-yang, LÜ Yong-bo, LIU Bu-shi, et al. Study on Safety Evaluation and Early Warning of Highway Bridge Construction Process[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2019,43(2):131-136.(in Chinese)
[10] CASSIDY M J.Predicting Vehicle Delays,and Queue Lengths on Two-lane Highways during Maintenance Activity[C]//Proceedings of TRB 71st Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C.:Transportation Research Board,1992.
[11] ROUPHAIL N M,YANG Z S,FAZIO J.Comparative Study of Short and Long Term Urban Freeway Work Zones[J]. Transportation Research Record,1988, 1163:4-14.
[12] KRAMMERS R A,LOPEZ G O.Updated Capacity Values for Short-term Freeway Work Zone Lane Closures[J]. Transportation Research Record,1994, 1442:49-56.
[13] BOARNET M, KIM E, PARKANY E. Measuring Traffic Congestion[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1998,1634:93-99.
[14] TURNER S, MARGIOTTA R, LOMAX T. Monitoring Urban Freeways in 2003:Current Conditions and Trends from Archived Operations Data[R]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Highway Administration, 2004.
[15] SCHRANK D, EISELE B, LOMAX T, et al. 2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard[R]. College Station:Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 2015.
[16] JIANG X M, ADELI H. Object-oriented Model for Freeway Work Zone Capacity and Queue Delay Estimation[J].Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2004, 19(2):144-156.
[17] GB/T 29107-2012, Road Traffic Information Service-Traffic Condition Description[S].(in Chinese)
[18] ZHONG Lian-de, SUN Xiao-duan. Relationship between Traffic Flow and Safety on Freeway[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2013,39(2):251-256.(in Chinese) |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 17 
